The hominin cranial capacity data was reanalyzed using
simulations, which emulated the variability in the estimation of cranial
capacity of hominin skulls. First, the data was explored using k-means
clustering to establish the presence of two groups in the data. The groups werefurther confirmed by using Hamming distance on the simulated cluster outcomes.
Then, the resulting two datasets arising from two groups were used to estimate
the confidence limits for the parameter estimates of Henneberg’s double
exponential model.
Through these parameter estimates and their confidence limits
it could be seen that two models for two time spans identified by cluster
analysis were better than a single model for the full span of time, which the
previous authors considered to be the best option. From an analyticalperspective, there are indications for a structural change in cranial capacitygrowth, which is expressed as a rapid increase after a slow growth period. This
structural change scenario does not support the rejection of the concept of
punctuated equilibrium on the basis of a gradual change based on the double
exponential model.
No comments:
Post a Comment